It's not just whether infection has been found in your restaurants, it's whether clusters could be found in your restaurants if measures aren't taken to minimize the chances of it.
It is an utterly stupid and self-serving argument for the restaurant chain to argue that because "No clusters have been found in our restaurants" therefore the requirement to close at a certain time is invalid. Perhaps you will, but I suspect most of us will not. If an edict is issued that you can only wear red color clothing after 6pm when there is a pandemic, would you follow such a foolish edict without question? There has to be a basis in facts and arbitrary edicts are not how democracies flourish.Ĭan you show everyone here how many cases of Covid are attributed to being transmitted in a restaurant after 8pm?Ĩpm is an arbitrary time based on nothing and can only be considered a foolish edict. There was an edict, but edicts are not laws.
#Sue's restaurant town and country free#
These poor fellows are using the arguments of simpletons that believe they are free to do whatever they want and ignore the law: that’s anarchy by the way.Ĭould you tell us which “law” says you must close? If the law says you must close because of a pandemic there is little you can do. Is illegal and unconstitutional as it infringes the right to freedom of businessįor heavens sake, in any country the frame of your « freedom » is set by the law.